vid of my car on the dyno

I've had this vid on my camera for awhile. I just uploaded it to my 'puter and thought I'd share with y'all. Sorry for the poor editing skills, I'm still a rookie. No music added.....wanted the full affect of the S/C whine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CcSCXGmxhk


Mitch

Great noise from that blower! What numbers did it put down that day?

395hp/421tq.... SW's dyno is a loaded Mustang Dyno. For comparisson, people say that his dyno reads about 60-70 hp/tq lower than a dyno-jet.

I love the whine, it never gets old.

JrSVT wrote:395hp/421tq.... SW's dyno is a loaded Mustang Dyno. For comparisson, people say that his dyno reads about 60-70 hp/tq lower than a dyno-jet.

thats a lot one or the other is way wrong 15%

Just going by what people say. I think the difference is that the Mustang dyno is loaded and the dynojet isn't. I dyno'd my car on an e-mail tune that was pretty conservative and made 463hp/469tq on HPP's dynojet a couple years ago.

Jr.

Terminator FTW

Nice #'s! Dynojets do tend to read a little higher. There is a correction factor in all dynos as well. Some are easy to tinker with to produce higher numbers and some arent. the dynojet is not a load dyno so therefore reads a bit higher numbers. The mustang dyno puts a load on the car to simulate real world conditions...thus taking RWHP away. Some say this is better for tuning purposes.

Its all numbers anyways....the real test is at the track

Grabber07' wrote:Nice #'s! Dynojets do tend to read a little higher. There is a correction factor in all dynos as well. Some are easy to tinker with to produce higher numbers and some arent. the dynojet is not a load dyno so therefore reads a bit higher numbers. The mustang dyno puts a load on the car to simulate real world conditions...thus taking RWHP away. Some say this is better for tuning purposes.

Its all numbers anyways....the real test is at the track

Yea this is all right, but still bugs me that one gt dynoed 320 at Gregs and 290 range on dynojet, the one with less mods than you Jrod. Also, like svt03chris dynoed lower at Gregs than at humble, then Blairs gt500 was right on with 440 range, just makes your head scratch. Oh well, its only good for air/fuel ratio in my book, track is where the proof is!

Leonard 95 wrote:

Grabber07' wrote:Nice #'s! Dynojets do tend to read a little higher. There is a correction factor in all dynos as well. Some are easy to tinker with to produce higher numbers and some arent. the dynojet is not a load dyno so therefore reads a bit higher numbers. The mustang dyno puts a load on the car to simulate real world conditions...thus taking RWHP away. Some say this is better for tuning purposes.

Its all numbers anyways....the real test is at the track

Yea this is all right, but still bugs me that one gt dynoed 320 at Gregs and 290 range on dynojet, the one with less mods than you Jrod. Also, like svt03chris dynoed lower at Gregs than at humble, then Blairs gt500 was right on with 440 range, just makes your head scratch. Oh well, its only good for air/fuel ratio in my back, track is where the proof is!

I agree. Dyno's are finakey. I like the mile per hour at the track. That will usually tell you about your power. It will not lie.